Well Excuuuuuse Me!

Eddie Nketiah deserved a red card. And we lost a result because of that red card.

I will leave it to others to crunch numbers across a season, or a game (how many fouls and no cards for Leicester? How many times has VAR overruled an Arsenal goal vs. other teams?), to determine if there are  unspoken biases by the officials against Arsenal hidden in those numbers. I suspect many supporters of many teams might find oddball imbalances that point to nefarious intent by match arbiters, but that’s not the point here.

The quibble I have is with that cliche of managers, of fans, the phrase “let’s not make excuses, we can’t blame this on the officiating”. And I get the psychology of that, to an extent. Don’t let your players believe that they can’t do better, that it’s all some sort of plot. Don’t look for reasons beyond quality of play, or of the squad. Fine. I get that.

But, imagine this line of thinking applied to other situations.

I have a first-class ticket on a long-haul flight. I am accidentally, and incorrectly, placed in coach by the gate attendant. The person whose seat I am (incorrectly) using is placed in my first class sleeper. The flight attendant, tickets be damned, won’t correct the error even after a review. My doppelganger enjoys a long, champagne-studded transatlantic flight and arrives to London rested, ready for business. I get no sleep, have my legs constantly banged by the drinks cart, and cannot get the odor of the galley out of my nose. The day of my arrival is, shall we say, unpleasant.

“let’s not make excuses, we can’t blame this on the gate attendant. We should be able to get sleep either way, and a glass of champagne tastes the same in row 5 as it does in row 42”.

Sure.

Or:

I order Thai food for delivery, same time as my neighbor does, from the same restaurant. About a half hour later they are met at the door with a brown bag filled with delicious curry, steaming hot, sticky rice, and enjoy a pleasant, leisurely meal. Their beer, cold. Their food, warm. I, on the other hand, wait. And wait. And wait. 15-20 minutes pass. I call the restaurant. Their claim, that “the delivery guy will be there right after he drops off the food next door”, goes unfulfilled. Turns out the guy delivered it to the wrong house, on the other side of my neighbor. And he left it on the doorstep since nobody was home. The restaurant calls me back, tells me this, and asks me to go retrieve it – but they will not replace the food because it was still delivered within the time frame required. The food is lukewarm, the curry congealed. Our beer, sitting out, has warmed slightly (as Americans we like our beer COLD).

“let’s not make excuses, we can’t blame this on the delivery guy. Fifteen minutes sitting out in 34 degrees Fahrenheit  does not change the spice level in the Penang. We have a microwave and heat is heat, what’s the difference?”.

Sure.

Look, we CAN ascribe results to events and circumstance. Because the reason things happen is because of the sequences of events that lead to those things happening. And external events, especially flawed or bad decisions by others that are damaging to plans damage those plans. There is no illogic or excuse-making in establishing circumstances, assessing the results of those circumstances, and then speculating that things might have gone better had those circumstances been different, and in one’s favor.

Oh, and if Jamie Vardy had properly been sent off for kicking Shkodran Mustafi we would have won that match. 

[Author’s Note: post edited for culinary accuracy]

Six Eyes, Six Eyes! (Or Should It Be Ten?)

There has been a great deal of honest (though divisive) debate about officiating in the EPL lately. A certain Frenchman has incurred the wrath of the FA for his rather impolitic comments about officials, their capabilities, even their allegiances. While we somewhat forgive this man his grievances (we haven’t been happy, either), we do believe there’s something of a myopic discussion about potential remedies to referees’ travails absent a more thorough consumption of actual time and space relative to the jobs that referees must do.

VAR this, tradition that. Gadgetry this, technophobia that. There are those who support the use of video, and those who think any electronic device within 50 miles of a football pitch will give us all Chuck McGill-like reactions. Before settling on whether there should be assisting devices (or people) that might expand the vision and correctness of subjective (or, in the case of some rules, objective) determinations, we wanted to take a quick look at other sports, their geography, and how they staff the oversight of their field of play. At first this is simply a quantitative bookkeeping exercise. We will merely look at different sports and their fields of play, how they staff officiating teams at the major professional level.

Some caveats: not all sports are created equal. Some are heavy contact sports by design (American Football, Ice Hockey), some are true non-contact sports (Tennis, Baseball), and some are non-contact sports that also engender contact between players, though with some concurrent and ostensibly commensurate penalties (Basketball, Football). Some sports involve densities of players and constant groupings or layers of players, while others isolate their participants throughout most action. Some sports have deliberated movements of players that limit speed naturally by athletic ability, while others involve tremendous velocity, smaller projectiles, and locomotion of bodies or elements facilitated by blades, bats etc. We do not intend to create false equivalencies* here or render judgment on technology, rather we are compiling this information to continue an informed and thorough discussion about how football might smartly approach improving officiating to create more predictably applied rules, to facilitate the execution of what seems to be a cruel and difficult task: the human judging of high-stakes athletic contests performed at tremendous speed across what can be literal acres of space.

*those come later

Non-Contact Contact Sports

EPL Football

Pitch Dimensions (Emirates): 114.8 yards x 74.4 yards
Pitch Area: 76,602 square feet (1.76 acres)
Number of Players: 22 (11 per team)
Number of On-Field Officials: 1
Number of Sideline Officials: 2
Number of Off-Field Officials: 1
Video Replay or Remotely Assisted Officiating: NO, other than Goal Line Technology
Timing Mechanism: Running Clock

Basketball

Court Dimensions: 94′ x50′
Court Area: 2,106 square feet (0.11 acres)
Number of Players: 10, five per team
Number of On-Court Officials: 3
Number of Off-Court Officials: 0
Video Replay or Remotely Assisted Officiating: YES
Timing Mechanism: Start/Stop Clock

Non-Contact Sports

Baseball

Field Dimensions (varies): MLB fields all vary in overall dimension

Field Area (Average, AL): 107,010 square feet (2.46 acres)

Number of Players: 18 (9 per team)

Number of On-Field Officials: 4

Video Replay or Remotely Assisted Officiating: YES

Timing Mechanism: No Clock

Tennis (singles):

Court Dimensions: 78′ x 27′

Court Area: 2106 square feet (0.05 acres)

Number of Players: 2

Number of On-Court Officials: 1 Chair Umpire

Number of Off-Court Officials: 8 (6 Line Umpires, 1 Referee, 1 Chief Umpire)

Video Replay or Remotely Assisted Officiating: YES

Timing Mechanism: No Clock

Contact Sports

American Football

Field Dimensions: 360′ x 160.5′

Field Area: 57,780 square feet (1.33 acres)

Number of Players: 22 (11 per team)

Number of On-Field Officials: 7

Video Replay or Remotely Assisted Officiating: YES

Timing Mechanism: Start/Stop Clock

Ice Hockey

Rink Dimensions: 200′ x 85′

Rink Area: 17,000 square feet (0.39 acres)

Number of Players: 12 (6 per team)

Number of On-Ice Officials: 4 (Two Referees, Two Linesmen)

Number of Off-Ice Officials: 2 (goal judges, whose import has become suspect)

Video Replay or Remotely Assisted Officiating: YES

Timing Mechanism: Start/Stop Clock

Up soon, hopefully: some subjective thoughts on the above.

-ab